INFORMATION LITERACY SKILLS OF UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS IN SELECTED UNIVERSITIES IN KENYA: A REVIEW LITERATURE
Date
2024Author
Momanyi, Evans Motari
Prof. Kiplangat, Joseph
Dr. Ng’eno, Emily
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the information literacy skills (ILS) of medical undergraduate
students in two public universities in Kenya and to propose an ILS framework to enhance the adequacy
of ILS among the medical undergraduates. With the growing size and complexity of library collections
coupled with the explosion of medical information in diverse formats, medical students require
competencies in identifying, locating, retrieving, evaluating, synthesizing, and effectively utilizing
information. There is a need, for medical students to acquire information literacy skills (ILS) to master
content, extend their investigations, and become more self-directed and life-long learners. The
objectives of the study were to: assess the status of ILS of medical undergraduate students at Moi
University and University of Nairobi; examine the ILS curricula and policies supporting delivery of
ILS to medical undergraduate students; examine the perceptions of medical undergraduate students
towards ILS; analyze the knowledge and skills possessed by staff engaged in facilitating ILS. The
study was informed by the Sauce Model and the Six Frames of Information Literacy Education Model.
A pragmatic research paradigm with a mixed-method approach was employed in the study. The study
adopted a descriptive survey design applied within a multiple case study, combining concurrent
triangulation in data collection and analysis. The target population was 685 students comprising 6thyear medicine, 5th
-year dentistry, and 4th
-year nursing students, and 182 lecturers. A combination of
stratified random and purposive sampling techniques was employed to obtain 353 medical
undergraduate students, 62 lecturers in medicine, dentistry, and nursing specializations, 2 university
librarians, 2 heads of medical librarians, and 6 heads of departments. Data was collected using
questionnaires and interview schedules. Quantitative data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and
presented using frequency distribution tables and bar charts while qualitative data was analyzed
thematically based on the objectives and research questions and presented as narrative.